The Civil Rights Act Turns 60: How Has It Impacted Compensation? | WorldatWork (2024)

Sixty years ago on July 2, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a landmark piece of legislation that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Specifically, Title VII of the Act prohibits such discrimination in compensation.

At the time, the move expanded the vision of the Equal Pay Act, which was passed a year prior. Today, the Civil Rights Act serves as the foundation for pay equity and pay transparency legislation.

“Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is one of the most important laws we have in our country,” said Jonathan A. Segal, partner and managing principal at Duane Morris LLP. “Many of the best compensation practices, such as ranges for positions, are a direct result of the focus on compensation created by Title VII and are increased by state and local pay equity and transparency laws.”

Laying the Groundwork

Where the Equal Pay Act only prohibits pay disparities between men and women, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act expanded those protections to include race, religion and national origin, Segal said.

Subsequent legislation would eventually also protect older workers, pregnant employees and individuals with disabilities, among others.

Title VII also expanded the field of potential comparison from the Equal Pay Act’s male counterpart performing “equal work” to “similarly situated” colleagues performing “substantially equal work.” If a comparator is not available, Title VII still empowers the employee to bring a discrimination claim if they can prove that they were paid less because of sex, race, color, religion or national origin, Segal said.

Compensation includes not only salary but also discretionary compensation, such as bonuses, equity interest and benefit options.

“From this perspective, the light of Title VII shines on every level of an organization,” Segal said. “In my experience, concerns about equality and equity often involve discretionary comp and equity interests. These employees often have the resources to fight, and employers should not assume that just because someone is making ‘good money,’ they won’t fight.”

“The light of Title VII shines on every level of an organization.
— Jonathan A. Segal, partner, Duane Morris LLP

Expanding Pay Equity and Pay Transparency

When Title VII was first passed, the first wave of lawsuits was focused on hiring discrimination. Over time, the lawsuits shifted to address unconscious bias in promotions and, more recently, pay.

“The Civil Rights Act empowered those who influence pay systems to remedy ingrained disparities and develop and implement more robust policies and practices aimed at achieving genuine pay equity, beyond mere compliance,” said Marta Turba, vice president of content strategy at WorldatWork. “While wage disparities persist, the Act continues to be an essential tool in the ongoing effort to achieve pay equity and has played a key role in reducing wage gaps across many groups.”

“While wage disparities persist, the Act continues to be an essential tool in the ongoing effort to achieve pay equity.”
— Marta Turba, VP of content strategy, WorldatWork

Inspired by the Civil Rights Act, many state and local governments have enacted laws that push for greater transparency and fairness in compensation disclosure and proactive measures to ensure equity, Turba continued.

“These initiatives aim to extend the spirit of the Civil Rights Act, fostering a compensation environment that is not only compliant, but truly equitable and open,” she said.

States with current pay equity and pay transparency laws on the books include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon and Washington.

In many of these laws, where the analysis includes a comparator, the standard is even more lenient — simply either “comparable” or “substantially similar,” Segal added.

“We’re seeing the rise of pay transparency laws, which were built on the guiding principles of Title VII, but take the legal mandate one step further,” he said.

Pay Transparency Is Just Good Business

Research shows that organizations that don’t commit to at least the basics of pay transparency, such as including salary bands on job postings, will lose out in the race for talent — a ResumeLab study found 80% of employees won’t even apply to jobs where the pay range is not disclosed.

Regular pay equity audits and the disclosure of pay ranges in job postings are key practices that promote openness, Turba said. This transparency helps employees understand their pay scales and how they compare to others in similar roles, fostering a clearer and fairer work environment.

“The Civil Rights Act leveled the playing field and bolstered the principle of equal pay for equal work, which is fundamental to compensation design and job valuation practices around the world,” Turba said. “It’s amazing to see how this one act has influenced so many important changes, ensuring fairness and equity in pay are always front and center.”

Editor’s Note: Additional Content

For more information and resources related to this article, see the pages below, which offer quick access to all WorldatWork content on these topics:

  • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging
  • Employee Compensation
The Civil Rights Act Turns 60: How Has It Impacted Compensation? | WorldatWork (2024)

FAQs

The Civil Rights Act Turns 60: How Has It Impacted Compensation? | WorldatWork? ›

“The Civil Rights Act empowered those who influence pay systems to remedy ingrained disparities and develop and implement more robust policies and practices aimed at achieving genuine pay equity, beyond mere compliance,” said Marta Turba, vice president of content strategy at WorldatWork.

How did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 affect employees? ›

It banned discriminatory practices in employment and ended segregation in public places such as swimming pools, libraries, and public schools. It also extended the Commission on Civil Rights, prevented discrimination in federally assisted programs, and established a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity.

What were the negative effects of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? ›

The biggest failure of the Civil Rights Movement was in the related areas of poverty and economic discrimination. Despite the laws we got passed, there is still widespread discrimination in employment and housing. Businesses owned by people of color are still denied equal access to markets, financing, and capital.

What did the Civil Rights Act of 1960 do? ›

The Civil Rights Act of 1960 ( Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States) 86–449, 74 Stat. 89, enacted May 6, 1960) is a United States federal law that established federal inspection of local voter registration polls and introduced penalties for anyone who obstructed someone's attempt to register to vote.

What happened in the Civil Rights Act of 1964? ›

The Act prohibited discrimination in public accommodations and federally funded programs. It also strengthened the enforcement of voting rights and the desegregation of schools. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the nation's benchmark civil rights legislation, and it continues to resonate in America.

What is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and hiring? ›

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended, protects employees and job applicants from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.

Which type of employer is exempt from the Civil Rights Act of 1964? ›

Employers of five or more are subject to the FEHA's prohibition against employment discrimination. Harassment is prohibited in all workplaces, even those with only one employee or independent contractor on staff. “Employer” does not include the federal government or a non-profit religious association or corporation.

How did the Civil Rights Act affect people? ›

This act, signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson on July 2, 1964, prohibited discrimination in public places, provided for the integration of schools and other public facilities, and made employment discrimination illegal. It was the most sweeping civil rights legislation since Reconstruction.

Why was the Civil Rights Act of 1964 not effective? ›

The 1964 Civil Rights Act did not initially have the enforcement powers needed to make it truly effective. However, Congress progressively strengthened the legislation.

What was violated by the civil rights of 1964? ›

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs to discriminate against any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in ...

What happened in 1961 with civil rights? ›

In May 1961, the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), led by James Farmer, organized integrated Freedom Rides to defy segregation in interstate transportation. Freedom Riders were arrested in North Carolina and beaten in South Carolina.

How did the South react to the Civil Rights Act of 1964? ›

The response of the white South as a whole to Title II of the 1964 Civil Rights Act has been one of compliance. Even some leaders who opposed the discrimination ban bitterly while it was being debated have shown a surprising willingness to accept and obey it now that it is the law.

Who opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964? ›

Democrats and Republicans from the Southern states opposed the bill and led an unsuccessful 60 working day filibuster, including Senators Albert Gore, Sr. (D-TN) and J. William Fulbright (D-AR), as well as Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), who personally filibustered for 14 hours straight.

What did the Civil Rights Act of 1965 do? ›

This act was signed into law on August 6, 1965, by President Lyndon Johnson. It outlawed the discriminatory voting practices adopted in many southern states after the Civil War, including literacy tests as a prerequisite to voting.

How did the 1963 Equal Pay Act and 1964 Civil Rights Act shape the gender gap in pay? ›

The magnitudes of our findings Page 7 EQUAL PAY ACT AND 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 7 are large enough to imply that federal antidiscrimination legis- lation reduced the within-job gender gap in pay by around 58% between 1964 and 1968.

Which statement best describes what the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did? ›

The correct statement that best describes this act is option A. The Act banned all racial discrimination in public facilities, such as hotels, restaurants, and theaters. It was a crucial step in the fight for civil rights and equal treatment for all Americans.

How did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 affect employees in Quizlet? ›

Feedback: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited job discrimination based on factors unrelated to job qualifications. This legislation is not associated with any of the other options.

What is the Civil Rights Act for employees? ›

Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166) ( CRA ) and the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-2) amend several sections of Title VII.

How did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 affect everyday people? ›

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 hastened the end of legal Jim Crow. It secured African Americans equal access to restaurants, transportation, and other public facilities. It enabled blacks, women, and other minorities to break down barriers in the workplace.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Clemencia Bogisich Ret

Last Updated:

Views: 6301

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Clemencia Bogisich Ret

Birthday: 2001-07-17

Address: Suite 794 53887 Geri Spring, West Cristentown, KY 54855

Phone: +5934435460663

Job: Central Hospitality Director

Hobby: Yoga, Electronics, Rafting, Lockpicking, Inline skating, Puzzles, scrapbook

Introduction: My name is Clemencia Bogisich Ret, I am a super, outstanding, graceful, friendly, vast, comfortable, agreeable person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.